This edition of JeepNewsNow.com sponsored by:
 
MiscellaneousMitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Posted by mike on 2008/12/7 21:10:54 (2094) reads

In order to even things out, I thought I'd post an anti-bailout opinion to counter the pro-bailout story I previously posted. I chose one that was referenced in the previous article - Mitt Romney's New York Times Op-Ed piece titled, "Let Detriot Go Bankrupt" (catchy, eh?) It is interesting to note that Mr. Romney's father, George Romney, once ran American Motors Corporation. From the piece:

First, their huge disadvantage in costs relative to foreign brands must be eliminated. That means new labor agreements to align pay and benefits to match those of workers at competitors like BMW, Honda, Nissan and Toyota. Furthermore, retiree benefits must be reduced so that the total burden per auto for domestic makers is not higher than that of foreign producers.

That extra burden is estimated to be more than $2,000 per car. Think what that means: Ford, for example, needs to cut $2,000 worth of features and quality out of its Taurus to compete with Toyota’s Avalon. Of course the Avalon feels like a better product — it has $2,000 more put into it. Considering this disadvantage, Detroit has done a remarkable job of designing and engineering its cars. But if this cost penalty persists, any bailout will only delay the inevitable.

Second, management as is must go. New faces should be recruited from unrelated industries — from companies widely respected for excellence in marketing, innovation, creativity and labor relations.

Well, what do you think? Let us know in the comments section.

Reader Reactions

The comments are owned by the poster.
We aren't responsible for their content.
You must login or register to post a comment.

Poster Thread
bkcurtis
Posted: 2008/12/8 18:27  Updated: 2008/12/8 20:06
Home away from home
Joined: 2005/10/8
From: NW Indiana, USA
Posts: 154
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
What this article doesn't mention is the governments role in the automakers financial woes.

Think about it. What are the government regulations on safety, CAFE standards, and a host of other factors costing the car manufactures?

While I think the car manufactures need short term help for a short term problem, I don't think we need a car czar--appointed by the federal government--to oversee another private business.

If one studies the Great Depression, one will see how the federal government's interventions actually prolonged the event.

Obviously, our politicians haven't studied history since we are about to repeat it when the new administration takes office next month.

Poster Thread
radojeep
Posted: 2008/12/16 19:09  Updated: 2008/12/16 19:09
Just popping in
Joined: 2008/12/16
From:
Posts: 1
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
The other makers have to follow the same regulations as Detroit, but I didn't see a Honda, Toyota, Nissan, or any other foreign jet in Washington asking for help. UAW and legacy costs are killing the big three. I have worked under the UAW, and I never want to be cursed like that again.

Poster Thread
bear7
Posted: 2008/12/8 13:42  Updated: 2008/12/8 13:42
Just popping in
Joined: 2008/1/8
From: Henderson KY
Posts: 1
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Instead of asking for a govenerment bail out, why doesn't Chrysler go to the UAW and say we need a 20% across board pay cuts or we'll have to close the doors. I'd be more infavor of financial aid if they were willing to make the tough decisions to stay afloat. Yes, large pay cuts and limited down sizing would be painful but I'd rather have 20% less pay than lose everything plus retirement. As long as there is hope for a bail they can put off the really tough decisions that need to be made for long term viability.

Poster Thread
my97tj
Posted: 2008/12/8 12:01  Updated: 2008/12/8 12:01
Not too shy to talk
Joined: 2006/9/18
From: North Central Mass
Posts: 22
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
i totally agree! too bad he isn't still our governor or, even better, our president elect!

Poster Thread
chuknchez
Posted: 2008/12/8 11:28  Updated: 2008/12/8 11:28
Just popping in
Joined: 2008/4/22
From:
Posts: 10
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
The apple doesn't fall from the tree. Romney's father was a business visionary, but not a political visionary. Mitt's dad saw the post World War II fallout on the auto industry years before anyone else did. He tried to consolidate Packard, Nash, Hudson, and Studebaker into one giant company. Hudson-Nash became American Motors, and Packard and Studebaker became history. Too bad he left AMC to run for president, otherwise AMC would still be around today. Mitt should stay with business and stay out of politics.

Poster Thread
JoeJeep
Posted: 2008/12/8 10:30  Updated: 2008/12/8 10:30
Just popping in
Joined: 2005/8/2
From:
Posts: 15
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
I agree 100%!!! I'm aginst the bailouts.

Poster Thread
loner
Posted: 2008/12/8 10:28  Updated: 2008/12/8 10:29
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2006/2/24
From:
Posts: 71
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Well at least I won't have to ever worry about Mitt Romney stepping foot in Michigan ever again. LOL!

I am so torn on the whole thing. They clearly do not deserve a bailout but what they did was merely incompetent not verging on willfully criminal as in the finance industry. In the end even if they all fail in 5 years it's worth postponing it so it doesn't send the economy into complete chaos now. The cost is a drop in the bucket compared to all the money they are spending elsewhere and would give some time for prospective buyers of salvageable parts of the big three to putn together a plan. There are MANY worse things to spend money on than that.

Poster Thread
Weave
Posted: 2008/12/8 9:54  Updated: 2008/12/8 10:01
Just popping in
Joined: 2006/2/1
From:
Posts: 5
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Sounds pretty good. It all makes sense except for the risk of poor customer perception associated with bankruptcy that isn't addressed above. Would I buy a Big 3 product if they were in chapter 11? Yes, because I know what is going on and what will become of it. However, all that Joe Public hears from the media is the word bankrupt and it's off to the import/transplant dealer because he thinks the Big 3 are going out of business. Then the Big 3 is on its way to chapter 7 bankruptcy and really going out of business.

Poster Thread
wjsiii
Posted: 2008/12/7 21:51  Updated: 2008/12/7 21:51
Quite a regular
Joined: 2005/7/16
From:
Posts: 65
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
I agree.

Poster Thread
trevorj
Posted: 2008/12/8 15:09  Updated: 2008/12/8 15:09
Just can't stay away
Joined: 2006/6/30
From: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 124
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Sure. Whatever it takes to keep this bigot out of politics.

Poster Thread
ac106
Posted: 2008/12/9 11:56  Updated: 2008/12/9 11:56
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/6/4
From:
Posts: 4
 Re: Mitt Romney Offers Argument Against Bailout of Chrysler
Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make them a bigot...
Main Menu
JeepNewsNow Everywhere
Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Jeep Classifieds
Syndication - RSS
Add Jeep News Headlines to your site for free!

Display the latest Jeep news headlines on your Web site using our RSS 2.0 news feed!

RSS 2.0

Or, if you prefer, an even easier way of putting the headlines on your Web site is to utilize our free, JavaScript-based headlines. Check them out!
Who's Online
7 user(s) are online (1 user(s) are browsing News)

Members: 0
Guests: 7

more...
Advertisements
mike's totally free jeep news now is designed and maintained by AnelloConsulting.com
Copyright © 1998-2010 mike's totally free jeep news now
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Advertising Info